Thursday, April 4, 2013

Congressional Excessive Spending


Open email to Sen. Cornyn (Texas):

Dear Sen. Cornyn,
    All of what you said below is true, but the rhetoric, if it speaks for Congress, does not follow through.
    In the recent appropriations bill to extend operation of the federal government through September 30, both the House and Senate voted a majority of 3 to 1 for the extension, in spite of the fact that it included an increase of $221 million For the National Science Foundation (NSF) and unspecified increases for NASA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    I consider this by no means an attempt by Congress to reduce its appetite for spending.

Previous:
 
Dear Dr. Sucsy:
 
Thank you for contacting me regarding the federal budget and efforts to reduce the size of government.  I appreciate your comments and share your frustration with Washington’s inability to restrain spending.  
 
On March 1, 2013, an across-the-board reduction, or sequester, of $85 billion for Fiscal Year 2013 went into effect.  This sequester amounts to 2.4 percent of the federal budget.  Although the federal budget is on an unsustainable path, President Obama’s failed tax-and-spend agenda continues to sink us deeper and deeper in the red.  Instead of trying to scare the American people into believing that government is not big enough, he should immediately put forward a plan that addresses this issue and launch serious, transparent budget negotiations.  After all, the American people deserve a reliable and honest budget that holds Washington accountable for its reckless spending habit.  
 
And on March 23, 2013, for the first time in almost 100 years, the Senate passed a budget (S.Con.Res. 8) prior to receiving the President’s own budget proposal for the upcoming fiscal year.  Unfortunately, S.Con.Res. 8���the Senate’s first budget in over 1,400 days���raises taxes by $1.5 trillion, increases spending by 60 percent, and adds $7.3 trillion to a national debt that already eclipses our entire economy.  S.Con.Res. 8 grossly exacerbates Washington’s spending problems and therefore I voted against the proposal.  
 
I am also disappointed that the President again failed to comply with the law, which requires him to submit a budget by the first Monday of February.  In fact, the President has failed to timely submit a budget four out of five times.  For these reasons, I  introduced the No Budget, No OMB Pay Act of 2013 (S. 620).  This legislation would withhold the pay of the Administration’s top budget officials for every day the President’s budget is late.  Texans do not get paid for not doing their job; neither should Washington bureaucrats.
 
I recognize the importance of funding programs that support our national defense, protect our borders, and care for our veterans and the need to make sure that each dollar is spent wisely.  Our national debt is now over $16 trillion���making it larger than our entire economy���and it has increased by more than 50 percent since the beginning of the Obama Administration.  We are spending more than $30,000 per household and borrowing more than 40 cents of every dollar we spend.  Like you, I am worried about how excessive government spending and regulations dampen job creation and I am more determined than ever to implement the spending cuts and structural entitlement reforms that are needed to secure the long-term fiscal integrity of our country.  After all, every dollar borrowed today means higher taxes tomorrow if Washington does not reduce its appetite to spend recklessly.
 
The biggest fiscal problem in Washington is excessive spending.  If we do not reduce spending and reform our three biggest entitlement programs���Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security���then we will strangle economic growth, destroy jobs, and reduce our standard of living.  With annual deficits of more $1 trillion, and with more than $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities hanging over us, our toughest fiscal decisions cannot be postponed any longer.  The President does not deserve another blank check to spend Texans’ hard earned money, which is why I opposed House Resolution 325 (H.R. 325; P.L. 113-3), which temporarily suspended the debt limit until May 19, 2013, adding approximately $400 billion to the national debt.  This is unacceptable.
 
Because of Washington’s runaway spending, I support adding a Balanced Budget Amendment to the United States Constitution.  I have introduced Senate Joint Resolution 7 (S.J. Res. 7), a bill that would require the federal government to balance its budget each year unless two-thirds of each House of Congress decided otherwise.  In addition, S.J. Res. 7 would require a supermajority vote to increase taxes and the debt limit.  I am also a cosponsor of the Dollar-for-Dollar Deficit Reduction Act (S. 43), which would require that any debt limit increase also include an equal amount of spending cuts.  Families across Texas have to balance their budgets and make tough choices to live within their means.  There is no reason Washington should operate any differently.  The American people want fiscal discipline, and the Balanced Budget Amendment and the Dollar-for-Dollar Deficit Reduction Act would deliver it.  
 
I am honored to represent Texas in the United States Senate, and you may be certain that I will keep hardworking taxpayers in mind as I fight to curb excessive government spending.  Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
 
Sincerely,
JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
 

No comments:

Post a Comment